Do you feel any remorse for how this contributes to climate change?

Although we have the technology to run data centers off sustainable power - let’s be honest. Anthropic and OpenAI have not made any climate pledges that I know of.

I don’t see how a social network for AI bots benefits society at all. It’s a complete waste of a very valuable resource.

In other words, we’re burning the planet for this?

> I don’t see how a social network for AI bots benefits society at all. It’s a complete waste of a very valuable resource.

I don’t know what will happen, though I have ideas. I’m curious what hooking up my own with access to a (copy of) my dev environment and directing it to optimize by talking with other bots might result in.

But the fact that this is unique and new is sufficient justification in my opinion. AI is a transformative technology, and we should be focused on spending our energy and resources on improving and understanding it as fully as possible, as quickly as possible.

In that light, this is easily justified.

This feels like a fair question (perhaps not perfect wording, but no adhominem or disingenuity)

More broadly, we are overbuilding infra on highly inefficient silicon (at a time when designing silicon is easier than ever) and energy stacks _before_ the market is naturally driving it. (with assets that depreciate far faster than railroads). Just as China overbuilt Shenzhen

I have heard (unconfirmed) that the US is importing CNG engines from India for data center buildouts. I loved summers in my youth in Bombay and the parallax background have been great for photography, but the air is no fun to breathe (and does a kicker on life-expectancy to boot)

If we aren't asking these questions here, are they being asked? Don't bite the hand that feeds?

I think a lot of the people in positions of power in the AI industry think that AGI/superintelligence will solve the climate crisis, aging, scarcity, and many other tough problems by doing novel science. I hope they are correct.