Yeah but the choice isn't "do I spend two weeks on this, or do I spend a lifetime?". It's "I have two weeks, do I spend them making the whole thing with AI, or 5% of it without?".

▲

jurgenaut23 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

It must be me getting old, but definitely 5% of it without, if your goal is to learn something. 5% of thinking about a hard problem is more valuable than 100% of letting it being done by someone else.

Especially when the value of the end result is close to zero, since it is now so easy to do and replicate.

	▲	stavros 14 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Eh, my goal is to make something, personally.

▲

codingminds 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If it's inaccurate it's worthless anyhow.

It's absolutely no issue to build all the technical and design stuff with AI, but science facts must be science facts and not just AI gibberish presented like facts.

What's the benefit of presenting not trustworthy data?

	▲	stavros 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That's an entirely different argument, though. Let's not move the goalposts.