| ▲ | abainbridge 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Seems like it is no longer considered to be anything to do with a meteorite impact. It's hard to find a good source. This is the best I found: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_possible_impact_struct... I think this paper's abstract claims that wooden debris from the landslide has been dated to 5000 years older than the Sumerian tablet: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329153343_The_produ... | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | griffzhowl 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
If you're looking for a source on the landslide, another commenter here posted this, that seems more reliable than wikipedia. Searching for Kofel's impact, rather than landslide, brings up nonsense because there's only pseudo-evidence for that. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01695... It dates the landslide to about 9400 years ago (BP), so this article about the star map putting it at 5500 years ago seems to be a colourful fabrication (my bad). The author of the meteor theory apparently even tries to connect it to Sodom and Gomorrah being hit by the passing heat! Lol Finding reliable info on this "planisphere" tablet isn't easy. As far as I can tell it was untranslated and kept a low profile until this impact story | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | urxvtcd 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Eh, so too good to be true. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||