Well the way I see it is that it's more a matter of what if more people are producing more efficiently but from the organization standpoint it's not apparent, it's a kind of DDoS on governance and decision, and a fast one.

Now I don't see how flattening hierarchy could cure this. Decisions must still be taken for example for utilities and any other complex system and people must work so we need role shifts and we need process changes effective and apparent for organizations otherwise thay won't benefit and suffer from the shock.

The analogy with COVID was also a kind of what if: could we have an economic confinement if efficiency gains are collapsing the economy ?

Flattening makes the vertical path faster even if the company has already optimized there, for instance, if 5% of someone work requires approval, and this person produces 50% more in a day, the 5% to be approved is suddenly way larger, this is one of the over-efficiency side effect that caught my attention.

But it does not remove the horizontal coordination that high-stakes changes require (legal, finance, security, etc), so in a sense I agree, it doesn't totally cure decision making DDoS, but it helps.

---

The COVID analogy is interesting, so your assumption is that companies will struggle to make profit because they'll operate changes to handle over-efficiency and these would lead to high financial losses?