I see this argument all the time, and while it sounds great on paper (you're an architect now, not a developer) people forget (or omit?) that a product needs far fewer architects than developers, meaning the workforce gets in fact trimmed down thanks to AI advancements.

I would also point out that a lot of real world problems don’t need a complex architecture. They just need to follow some well established patterns.

It is a pattern matching problem and that seems to me to be something AI is/will be particularly good at.

Maybe it won’t be the perfect architecture, or the most efficient implementation. But that doesn’t seem to have stopped many companies before.