| ▲ | jeffwass 7 hours ago | |
Two thoughts on situations where the 555 may be preferable, if anyone has experience how these compare : 1. Low-noise applications. I’d naively expect the 555 to be less noisy than a clocked digital microcontroller, though it’s been awhile since I’ve worked in this space. 2. Low power applications. How does latent power draw compare between a 555 and a typical low power microcontroller? | ||
| ▲ | tdeck 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
> Low power applications. How does latent power draw compare between a 555 and a typical low power microcontroller? The 555 is very power hungry compared to a typical cheap low-power microcontroller. IIRC there are lower power variants but the 555 still fundamentally does timing by draining current through a resistor, which is going to result in losses. | ||
| ▲ | dubbie99 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
A micro is far superior on both these metrics. | ||
| ▲ | ErroneousBosh 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> I’d naively expect the 555 to be less noisy than a clocked digital microcontroller TTL ones were exceptionally noisy because the output transistors "shot through" - both output transistors would conduct for a moment shorting the supply rail to ground and crowbarring ridiculous interference onto other parts of the circuit. | ||