Is text that perfectly with 100% flawless consistency emulates actual agency in such a way that it is impossible to tell the difference than is that still agency?

Technically no, but we wouldn't be able to know otherwise. That gap is closing.

▲

adastra22 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Technically no

There's no technical basis for stating that.

	▲	threethirtytwo 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Text that imitates agency 100 percent perfectly is technically by the word itself an imitation and thus technically not agentic.

▲

teekert 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Between the Chinese room and “real” agency?