Remix.run Logo
Scene_Cast2 2 hours ago

As someone who's worked with population data, I found that there is an enormous rift between reported opinion (and HN and reddit opinion) vs revealed (through experimentation) population preferences.

Macha an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I always thought that the idea that "revealed preferences" are preferences, discounts that people often make decisions they would rather not. It's like the whole idea that if you're on a diet, it's easier to not have junk food in the house to begin with than to have junk food and not eat more than your target amount. Are you saying these people want to put on weight? Or is it just they've been put in a situation that defeats their impulse control?

I feel a lot of the "revealed preference" stuff in advertising is similar in advertisers finding that if they get past the easier barriers that users put in place, then really it's easier to sell them stuff that at a higher level the users do not want.

cal_dent an hour ago | parent [-]

Perfectly put. Revealed preference simply assumes impulses are all correct, which is not the case, an exploits that.

Drugs make you feel great, in moderation perfectly acceptable, constantly not so much.

tunesmith an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well that's what akrasia is. It's not necessarily a contradiction that needs to be reconciled. It's fine to accept that people might want to behave differently than how they are behaving.

A lot of our industry is still based on the assumption that we should deliver to people what they demonstrate they want, rather than what they say they want.

make3 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Exactly, that sounds to me like a TikTok vs NPR/books thing, people tell everyone what they read, then go spend 11h watching TikToks until 2am.

toss1 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sounds both true and interesting. Any particularly wild and/or illuminating examples of which you can share more detail?

jaggederest 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

My favorite somewhat off topic example of this is some qualitative research I was building the software for a long time ago.

The difference between the responses and the pictures was illuminating, especially in one study in particular - you'd ask people "how do you store your lunch meat" and they say "in the fridge, in the crisper drawer, in a ziploc bag", and when you asked them to take a picture of it, it was just ripped open and tossed in anywhere.

This apparently horrified the lunch meat people ("But it'll get all crusty and dried out!", to paraphrase), which that study and ones like it are the reason lunch meat comes with disposable containers now, or is resealable, instead of just in a tear-to-open packet. Every time I go grocery shopping it's an interesting experience knowing that specific thing is in a small way a result of some of the work I did a long time ago.

hnuser123456 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The "my boyfriend is AI" subreddit.

A lot of people are lonely and talking to these things like a significant other. They value roleplay instruction following that creates "immersion." They tell it to be dark and mysterious and call itself a pet name. GPT-4o was apparently their favorite because it was very "steerable." Then it broke the news that people were doing this, some of them falling off the deep end with it, so they had to tone back the steerability a bit with 5, and these users seem to say 5 breaks immersion with more safeguards.

cm2012 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This is why I work in direct performance advertising. Our work reveals the truth!

make3 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Your work exploits people's addictive propensity and behaviours, and gives corporations incentives and tools to build on that.

Insane spin you're putting on it. At best, you're a cog in one of the worst recent evolutions of capitalism.

cm2012 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Exploitative ads are a small minority. I also think gambling advertising should be banned.

marrone12 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Advertising is not a recent evolution of capitalism, it's a foundational piece of it. Whatever you do as a job would not exist if there was no one marketing it. This hostility seems insane.

q3k 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not having my job would be a tiny price to pay compared to the benefit of living in a world with no advertisements.

12345ieee 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The early theorists of capitalism didn't imagine that advanced psychology (that didn't even exist back then) would be used to convince people to buy $product.

Messages of that sophistication are always dangerous, and modern advertising is the most widespread example of it.

The hostility is more than justified, I can only hope the whole industry is regulated downwards, even if whatever company I work for sells less.

eru an hour ago | parent [-]

> Messages of that sophistication [...]

By demonising them, you are making ads sounds way more glamorous than they are.

losteric 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Advertising always seems like a prisoner’s dilemma. If no one advertised, people would still buy things.

cm2012 an hour ago | parent [-]

Yes but the advantage would be much more towards incumbents

DetroitThrow 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>it's a foundational piece of it

No it's not

2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]