> "I asked it to summarize reports, it decided to email the competitor on its own" is hard to refute with current architectures.

No, it's trivial: "So you admit you uploaded confidential information to the unpredictable tool with wide capabilities?"

> Who's accountable when the action executed three hops away from the human?

The human is accountable.

▲

pixl97 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

As the saying goes

----

A computer can never be held accountable

Therefore a computer must never make a management decision

	▲	direwolf20 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That's when companies were accountable for their results and needed to push the accountability to a person to deter bad results. You couldn't let a computer make a decision because the computer can't be deterred by accountability. Now companies are all about doing bad all the time, they know they're doing it, and need to avoid any individual being accountable for it. Computers are the perfect tool to make decisions without obvious accountability.

▲

gowld 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What if you carried a stack of papers between buildings on a windy day, and the papers blew away?

	▲	bigfishrunning 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You should have put the papers in a briefcase or a bag. You are responsible.

▲

Muromec 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>The human is accountable.

That's an orthodoxy. It holds for now (in theory and most of the time), but it's just an opinion, like a lot of other things.

Who is accountable when we have a recession or when people can't afford whatever we strongly believe should be affordable? The system, the government, the market, late stage capitalism or whatever. Not a person that actually goes to jail.

If the value proposition becomes attractive, we can choose to believe that the human is not in fact accountable here, but the electric shaitan is. We just didn't pray good enough, but did our best really. What else can we expect?