Sounds good in theory, doesn't work in reality.

Had it worked then we would have seen many more CEOs in prison.

There being a few edge cases where it doesn't work in doesn't mean it doesn't work in the majority of cases and that we shouldn't try to fix the edge cases.

CEOs are like cars and immigrants. Both kill people all the time, but we choose to believe they are net positive to society, look the other way and try to put symbolic band aids here and there.

The same may happen to AI or not. We can bite the bullet and say it's fine that it sometimes happens. We can ban the entire thing too if we feel the tradeoff not worth it

This isn't a legal argument and these conversations are so tiring because everyone here is insistent upon drawing legal conclusions from these nonsense conversations.

We're taking about different things. To take responsibility is volunteering to accept accountability without a fight.

In practice, almost everyone is held potentially or actually accountable for things they never had a choice in. Some are never held accountable for things they freely choose, because they have some way to dodge accountability.

The CEOs who don't accept accountability were lying when they said they were responsible.

The veil of liability is built into statute, and it's no accident.

Such so magic forcefield exists for you, though.