| ▲ | themafia 11 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> It's likely that a fully-attentive human driver would have done worse. > a huge portion of human drivers What are you basing any of these blind assertions off of? They are not at all born out by the massive amounts of data we have surrounding driving in the US. Of course Waymo is going to sell you a self-serving line but here on Hacker News you should absolutely challenge that. In particular because it's very far out of line with real world data provided by the government. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jobs_throwaway 11 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
If you have contradicting data I'd be glad to see it >It's likely that a fully-attentive human driver would have done worse. Is based off the source I gave in my comment, the peer-reviewed model > a huge portion of human drivers Is based on my experience and bits of data like 30% of fatal accidents involving alcohol Like I said, if you have better data I'm glad to see it | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||