| ▲ | ZenoArrow 14 hours ago |
| I'd see Chinese RAM manufacturers like CXMT filling the void left in the market for consumer-grade RAM modules, I appreciate they face challenges (like lack of access to cutting edge EUV machines), but the RAM just needs to be fast enough and affordable enough for the average user for these companies to make significant inroads into the market that Micron, Samsung and SK Hynix are abandoning to chase the AI server market. |
|
| ▲ | filloooo 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Their scale is simply too small to affect the market outside China, majority of their chips will be eaten up by HBM3 production with yet unknown yield rate. They are forbidden to buy foreign equipment beyond their current process node, which is already obsolete, die size is 40% bigger than Samsung, not to mention lithography, the big 3 are using EUV while they are stuck with lobotomized DUV. They can start making some decent money now, but vastly expanding capacity as is means enormous losses if the cycle went downward a few years later, that's how all previous makers went bankrupt. They can squeeze out a bit more performance if they are ready to go beyond their current node using only domestic equipment and be blacklisted by the US government. But the cap is there, unless they can make a working EUV machine in 5 years, they are doomed to be a minor player, if the current cycle even lasts that long. |
| |
| ▲ | direwolf20 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | They will grow exponentially and catch the western market unawares in 10-15 years with a sudden flood of cheap, effective chips. Just like everything else China makes. Electric vehicles for example. | | |
| ▲ | filloooo 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Sure, if they've got production grade EUV, but right now they don't even have production grade DUV. I'm also sure they can go as far as 5nm like SMIC if they really wanted to, since it's strategic for China, but the cost would only be justified if the current cycle lasts long enough. | | |
| ▲ | direwolf20 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I was corrected elsewhere when I thought RAM was more expensive 10 years ago. RAM was actually cheaper 10 years ago, when it was DDR3/DDR4 too. If any company can replicate the 10 year old SOTA, they can bring prices down. | | |
| ▲ | mikestorrent 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is what I expect to happen. 2016's ram was good enough for consumers then and probably still is for a huge class of consumers now. I'd rather 32GB of DDR3 than 8gb of DDR5. | | |
| ▲ | filloooo 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | DRAM rarely break, yes, I have bought cottage industry recycled DDR3 with no problem whatsoever. The problem, however, is IO controller support has been dropped, many new CPUs don't even support DDR4 any more, especially mobile ones. | |
| ▲ | renewiltord 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You can get like terabytes of DDR3 used. No one wants that shit. Too slow. Power hog. | | |
| ▲ | nebula8804 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This is where China's crazy solar advantage affects real day to day outcomes. When you have electric costs going into 6-8 cents per kwh then you can run older nodes that slurp more electricity. They aren't even done lowering the price. I've thought about this recently. If the dream of meterless electricity came to fruition then that terabytes of DDR3 could essentially be run until it literally burned out and then recycled back into its core components. The sun provides more power than the entirety of society could possibly currently use and so its a shame that the ram is being tossed instead of used. | |
| ▲ | gunalx 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Well yes, but it isn't too cheap for how 8ld it is. | | |
| ▲ | renewiltord 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Some dude literally gave away a couple of terabytes on Reddit homelab subreddit the other day. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | justapassenger 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | China has a luxury of being able to not really care about the cost when it comes to what they view as a strategic advantage. | | |
| |
| ▲ | Imustaskforhelp 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The problem is that the chances of the bursting of AI bubble seem far more likely than this happening first which you say about 10-15 years. plus, the ram manufacturer cycle moves and does this all the time. Atrioc does a really good job explaining these cycles[0] But the point is that AI demand peaked when the supply was at its lowest which is why we are caught up in this messed up timeline that we live in. And this has sort of happen in the past too and this industries notorious for it (again watch the video, definitely worth it imo) But still it feels like we are in this atleast for a year or two hard. Micron is iirc like suggesting what hundreds of billions of $ in factory investment right now and saying that the fastest might open in early 2027 Some estimates 2028 idk, I do feel like the chances of AI bubble popping around this time are likely too. But still for atleast 1-2 years, we either as consumers or as small vps providers (yes the people who create vps providers are same people like you and me) are absolutely f*ed and the question is around that imo. [0] The AI Tax Has Started: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nipeaKC3dWs | | |
| ▲ | cogman10 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | The thing is, even if the market bursts, prices are already inflated. RAM manufacturers know that everything 5xed and they aren't likely going to rush out and drop the price levels to pre-expansion. Once the AI market bursts, you can expect slow and methodical decreases in price (if any). And that will ultimately buy China a lot of time to shove their ram into the market cutting ram manufacturers out of most non-US markets. I think the major memory manufacturers are simply banking on their ability to flood the market if worst comes to worse. That or I could see some standards trickery around DDR6 (or some new BS standard). It'd not shock me if they coordinated with AMD/Intel to keep the standard secret as long as possible simply give themselves a lead in production. | | |
| ▲ | soanvig 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Graphic cards prices normalized quite quickly after crypto boom.
Before going nuts for AI training of course. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | RobotToaster 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | They're already producing 10nm DRAM with their current nodes, and they're working on producing 3d DRAM which may make node size somewhat moot. | | |
| ▲ | filloooo 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | Not 10nm, they are producing with 18.5nm and 17nm now, which technically already is in breach of US restrictions, the US government can blacklist them if they feel like it. 3D DRAM is no magic, it will only give them maybe 2 generations' breathing room if they got the required etching equipment figured out. But others will be doing 3D DRAM with EUV by then. | | |
| ▲ | RobotToaster 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Are you sure? >CXMT has begun mass production of DRAM using a D1z (sub-16nm) process. https://www.globalsmt.net/advanced-packaging/decoding-cxmt-d... They call it "10nm class" later in the article. It's hard to find much concrete info tbh. | |
| ▲ | direwolf20 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If the US government bans the import of RAM, it guarantees the immediate collapse of the US. | | |
| ▲ | filloooo 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don't think so, Lutnick just made sure the US wouldn't need to import DRAM with his newest threats. | | |
| ▲ | direwolf20 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Wow. They are 100% tariffing all RAM. RAM is not made in the USA. This destroys all the AI companies, and more. | | |
| ▲ | kube-system 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > RAM is not made in the USA Micron Fab 6 currently makes about 2% of global memory production in Virginia. The plant is currently being expanded and upgraded to Micron's 1a node. | |
| ▲ | CamperBob2 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't understand why we don't just cut to the chase and elect the Joker in 2028. The same people will vote for him, and he won't be any worse for the country. | | |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | ErroneousBosh 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > They can squeeze out a bit more performance if they are ready to go beyond their current node using only domestic equipment and be blacklisted by the US government. Which suits the rest of the world just fine. More for the rest of us, and if the single-digit-percent portion of their market that the US represents wants to lock itself out, no skin off anyone else's nose. | |
| ▲ | zozbot234 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Obsolete process node hardly matters when the rest of the market is bottlenecked on production capacity; small overall scale still might. Expanding capacity may or may not make sense; it depends on your prediction of the way the market will go. |
|
|
| ▲ | dist-epoch 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| China also needs RAM for AIs, especially since they have plenty of electrical power and building speed to pump out data-centers. |
| |
| ▲ | actionfromafar 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | Turns out their wind "opercapacity" maybe isn't. Maybe they are trading chip efficiency for raw power. | | |
| ▲ | bee_rider 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | Something I’ve been sort of wondering about—LLM training seems like it ought to be the most dispatchable possible workload (easy to pause the thing when you don’t have enough wind power, say). But, when I’ve brought this up before people have pointed out that, basically, top-tier GPU time is just so valuable that they always want to be training full speed ahead. But, hypothetically if they had a ton of previous gen GPUs (so, less efficient) and a ton of intermittent energy (from solar or wind) maybe it could be a good tradeoff to run them intermittently? Ultimately a workload that can profitably consumer “free” watts (and therefore flops) from renewable overprovisioning would be good for society I guess. | | |
| ▲ | WJW 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | First: Almost anything can be profitable if you have free inputs. Second: Even solar and wind are not really "free" as the capital costs still depreciate over the lifetime of the plant. You might be getting the power for near-zero or even negative cost for a short while, but the power cost advantage will very quickly be competed away since it's so easy to spend a lot of energy. Even remelting recycled metals would need much less capital investment than even a previous-gen datacentre. That leaves the GPUs. Even previous gen GPUs will still cost money if you want to buy them at scale, and those too depreciate over time even if you don't use them. So to get the maximum value out of them, you'd want to run them as much as possible, but that contradicts the business idea of utilizing low cost energy from intermittent sources. Long story short: in might work in very specific circumstances if you can make the numbers work. But the odds are heavily stacked against you because typically energy costs are relatively minor compared to capital costs, especially if you intend to run only a small fraction of the time when electricity is cheap. Do your own math for your own situation of course. If you live in Iceland things might be completely different. | | |
| ▲ | nebula8804 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | They are amazing at making batteries as well. How does adding batteries to the mix change the calculation? |
| |
| ▲ | zozbot234 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > top-tier GPU time is just so valuable that they always want to be training full speed ahead. I don't think this makes much sense because the "waste" of hardware infrastructure by going from 99.999% duty cycle to 99% is still only ~1%. It's linear in the fraction of forgone capacity, while the fraction of power costs you save from simply shaving off the costliest peaks and shifting that demand to the lows is superlinear. | |
| ▲ | actionfromafar 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think as such intermittent power comes on the grid in the coming decades, people will find creative uses for it. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | alecco 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| They will first fill the local demand for all their electronics manufacturing. Then their massive computer infra and AI. And if any is left, it will be bundled to local PC exporters like Lenovo. |
| |
| ▲ | nerdsniper 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | It’s fine if it’s just filling Chinese manufacturing. Low-cost VPS hosts are going to be using brands like Supermicro anyways. It still gets exported. Except for RAM from YMTC, which the USA gave a near-death sentence to by placing it on the Dept. of Commerce “Entity List” so no USA-associated business can do business with YMTC now. | | |
| ▲ | neelc 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This is true. We use ASRock Rack servers, mainly because the only option for our industry are OEMs like Supermicro and ASRock. Dell and HPE are non-starters, except for our "storage" offering. Back in 2019, HPE was a good midrange option. Then came ASRock Rack who obliterated HPE with the X470D4U, relegating HPE to high-end enterprise servers. But also made Ryzen-based VPS hosts including yours truly, BuyVM, et al. | |
| ▲ | nagisa 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Doesn't YMTC focus on NAND (i.e. flash storage) rather than DRAM? Regardless, point stands. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | anonym29 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >market that Micron, Samsung and SK Hynix are abandoning to chase the AI server market These three have collectively committed what, approaching $50B towards construction of new facilities and fabs in response to the demand? The memory industry has traditionally projected demand several years out and proactively scheduled construction and manufacturing to be able to meet the projected demand. The last time they did that, in the crypto boom, the boom quickly turned into a bust and the memory makers got burned with a bad case of oversupply for years. With that context, can you blame them for wanting to go a bit more slowly with this boom? Sure, the new fabs won't be up and at volume production until late 2027 / early 2028, but committing tens of billions of dollars to new production facilities, including to facilities dedicated to DRAM rather than NAND or HBM, is hardly 'abandoning'. They're pivoting to higher profit margin segments - rational behavior for a for-profit corporation - but thanks to the invisible hand of the (not quite as free as it should be) market, this is, partially, a self-solving issue, as DRAM margins soar while HBM margins compress, and we're already seeing industry response to that dynamic, too: https://www.guru3d.com/story/samsung-reallocates-of-hbm3-cap... |
|
| ▲ | realusername 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That's probably what is going to happen, it's a strategic opportunity for the Chinese government here, there's a big market demand that can fuel their domestic production capabilities that nobody wants to take. |
| |
| ▲ | giantrobot 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | It would be a strategic opportunity for Intel, if they weren't run by imbeciles. DDR4 doesn't require the latest and greatest nodes. It's boring old technology. Even DDR5 is pretty boring. Intel could clean up fabbing DRAM (like they used to). But alas no. They're part of the semiconductor cartel and uninterested in the supply of DRAM increasing. Prices would drop and the fabs would only make stupid margins instead of disgusting margins. | | |
| ▲ | zozbot234 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | Intel would be in the very same bind as every other DRAM producer who's trying to expand production today, only far worse because they have practically no experience fabbing DRAM compared to logic. (You can fab eDRAM on logic processes, but you'd only do that out of sheer desperation since the cost per bit is much higher.) What they could do very easily in this market is bring back frickin Optane and hook it up to a modern PCIe bus with modern PCIe performance. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | neelc 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I am very hopeful of CXMT. But then then it could take a while for them to ramp up production. Maybe by then, the AI bubble would've burst. One problem with US sanctions is it could hurt US companies too, like in the case of cutting-edge EUV and CXMT. This is when China is actually a hero and not a villain. |
| |
| ▲ | phatfish 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | We can certainly do with less plastic junk and fast fashion. But on the high end it hard to argue that cheaper Chinese products are ever a bad thing. If corporations in western (aligned) countries stopped feeding sovereign wealth funds and private equity with profits and actually invested something maybe they could compete with China more closely, even with whatever shenanigans the CPC get up to with state support. |
|
|
| ▲ | Imustaskforhelp 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I truly wish Chinese Ram manufacturers luck to fulfill this market. Seriously, the amount of ram and its downstream effects can be hardly understated imo. it really just starts impacting everything. |