Discussion here started on whether users check apps more often than websites and whether Patreon is the kind of platform that one might want to check often for new content.

I'm not sure how has the goalpost here moved to app-exclusivity, I understood exclusive here to mean "exclusive to Patreon" as opposed to supporting a creator that posts everything for free somewhere else, which is the use case that made that one user assume one doesn't check on Patreon often.

Also, mobile browsers easily cut out background audio so the website is nearly useless on a phone for audio posts compared to the app, as much as I'd prefer it.

▲

Izkata an hour ago | parent [-]

They specifically said "app" which is why I interpreted it as exclusive to the app.

The other way around is a little confusing as a question because that's the primary purpose of Patreon and is mentioned on the homepage marketing (multiple payment tiers with exclusive content).

	▲	cybrox an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I should have probably said: "[...] exclusive content which is curated on [the creators] Patreon and [accessible to the user via the web browser or] their app." Hope this clears things up. My main point was that there is in fact an incentive for users to check the app beyond setting up payment and forgetting about it. Even if it is not the only way such content is available, it certainly is a convenient one.
	▲	debugnik an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I'm willing to consider that they moved the goalpost and not you, but I still don't get how has this thread diverged. I too got confused by oneeyedpigeon's question but I assumed from their claim about it being "setup and forget" that they simply don't know much about it.