(No affiliation, just have been subscribed to the founder’s substack for a while)

Chris Masterjohn is a noted quack. He takes bits of actual science and research and weaves them together into narratives that make it sound like he has everything figured out with his unique protocols, but it doesn’t hold up to actual scrutiny. People spend years following his ever changing protocols without getting anywhere (beyond placebo effect and a large bill for supplements)

I know I won’t convince the parent commenter but hopefully I can convince other readers not to go down this road or invest any money in anything related to him.

	▲	ibeckermayer 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Pure ad hominem FUD. “This guy sometimes disagrees with scientists employed by the government, don’t listen to him!”. The technical details are beyond my understanding but I’ve heard from a PhD in the field that Masterjohn’s understanding of metabolism is second to none. Whether his protocols work or not is certainly a case by case matter (like any health protocol), but he always appears to substantiate it with well-cited lines of argument, and is willing to engage with interlocutors. As for spending years with changing protocols without getting anywhere besides spending lots of money, well that can be said for people with complex issues who go the institutionally approved route as well. It isn’t discrediting in its own right that a protocol didn’t work for some.