They're saying that it successfully filtered out the bit where the author told people to overdose by 40000x. I guess that's the value.

There would be value if it pointed out the mistake instead of hallucinating a correction.

	▲	pulvinar 7 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		GPT5.2 does catch it and warns to not trust anything else in the post, saying no competent person would confuse these units. I wonder if even the simplest LLM would make this particular mistake.
	▲	naasking 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		IU was correctly used everywhere else in the article except that one place with the mistak, so the LLM didn't hallucinate a correction, it correctly summarized what the bulk of the article actually said.