| ▲ | sarreph 10 hours ago | |||||||
How would you prove that? | ||||||||
| ▲ | Cthulhu_ 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
They don't, hence the suspicion instead of a definite assertion. And suspicions are easy, because what are the consequences if it's false? None. Anyway your comment smells AI generated, I can tell from some of the pixels and seeing quite a few shoops in my time. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Der_Einzige 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I don't need to "prove it", because all I have to do is link this: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.01754 https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01491 https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-short.47/ https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06166 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/wzveh_v1 https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08872 https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-acl.987/ https://aclanthology.org/2025.coling-main.426/ https://aclanthology.org/2025.iwsds-1.37/ https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.14.24307373v... https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/21522715251379... https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21817 Either they used an LLM to write part of it, or the linguistic mind virus infected them and now they speak a little bit like an LLM. | ||||||||
| ||||||||