| ▲ | Lucasoato 9 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
I feel that these shouldn't be alternatives. Calling something startup is up to the definition that we use; one that I like is the following:
A friend of mine used:
From these point of views, there are a lot of wonderful SMEs that need to see the ligth. They should be supported by the government and the community, but they need very different tools from what we define as startups.A seed round of million of dollars might not make sense for a flower shop, but could be reasonable if you plan to develop the next generation B2B flower shop SaaS integration. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | direwolf20 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Why should it grow to 100M in 5 years? A business can make $500k profit per year, with two employees, forever, and that's a moderate success. Sqlite is doing just that. And they're not captured by exponential growth, they're not going boom or bust filling sqlite with advertisements and AI. They just make a solid product that works. Is that bad? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | stef25 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> A company that just started that can scale to 100M evaluation in less than 5 years. How can you assign a name to something based on what might happen in < 5 years ? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | youngtaff 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
To me a startup is something that's not yet profitable | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||