>GP is merely recognizing the parts of technological advance that they do find enjoyable.

Machine fabrication is nice. Machine fabrication from sweatshop children in another country is not enjoyable. That's the exact nuance missing from their comment.

>GP simply voiced their opinion, which IMHO does not constitute "impedance" of those trying to fight for those futures.

I'd hope we'd understand since 2024 that we're in an attention society, and this is a very common tactic used to disenfranchise people from engaging in action against what they find unfair. Enforcing a feeling of inevitability is but one of many methods.

Intentionally or not, language like this does impede the efforts.