| ▲ | kccqzy 19 hours ago | |
If it was enabled, why can Apple still demand 30% cut here? Couldn’t Patreon just switch to external payment processors citing the Epic case? | ||
| ▲ | AstroBen 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
They'd have to require all current subscriptions be cancelled and the re-upped with the new payment processor, no? That's gunna be really costly But then again to avoid a 30% fee.. probably worth it | ||
| ▲ | colechristensen 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
They don't have to "cite the Epic case", it's just functionality available to everyone now. Your app is no longer blocked from approval for including an external payment provider. They'd actually have to do it though and that could lead to a large loss of revenue for themselves and their subscribers. | ||
| ▲ | ansc 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
_in the US_ | ||
| ▲ | ezfe 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Because Patreon doesn't want to do that. They could. | ||