| ▲ | account42 2 hours ago | |
Wile I don't think they deserved to loose their lives over it, calling them "innocent" is quite dishonest. They were at the very least intentionally being a nuisance and in most cases breaking actual laws in the process. | ||
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 39 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
> They were at the very least intentionally being a nuisance and in most cases breaking actual laws in the process Pretti was breaking zero laws. You’d have to do some prosecutorial voodoo to conjure up a misdemeanor. There is lawbreaking in that videos. But the felony-level stuff is all from folks in uniform. (Which, thankfully, they’ve started wearing.) | ||
| ▲ | maxehmookau 15 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Being a nuisance is not illegal. In the eyes of the law, someone being a nuisance is, indeed, innocent - and to say so is not dishonest. | ||
| ▲ | kdkirsch an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
So now being a nuisance is justification for summary extrajudicial executions?! If people on HN believe this then we’re toast. | ||