The big secret: certain pools of ancient humans have been smart for alot longer than modern evolutionary theory wants to admit

▲

adgjlsfhk1 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This isn't a problem for evolutionary theory. It's literally a necessary prediction of it. Most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps is 5-10 million years ago. Since we have observed tool usage in modern chimps and lots of very complicated tool use in humans, the necessary prediction is that some amount of tool use goes back at least ~5-10 million years, with increased complexity roughly tracking with the continuous increase in braincase size.

	▲	foxglacier 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Being in a common ancestor is certainly compatible with evolution but it's not necessary because it could have evolved independently in each branch.

▲

PinkSheep 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I don't understand why you think it'd be an issue?

Dumbed down understanding of mine: evolutionary theory predicts that graph goes from (0.1; 0) to (very high; in a million years). X axis: years, Y axis: progress or evolution. The only difference such discoveries make is to further refine the slope of the graph. Was the development linear or exponential? How fast did it progress? Obviously, in the past 500 years we didn't change as humans but our technological progress accelerated beyond belief.