| ▲ | ncruces 3 hours ago | |||||||
So the original post had this added to the top: > This post was updated at 11:15 a.m. Pacific time to clarify that the use case described here is a proof of concept. Some sections have been updated for clarity. But then the bottom still says: > Our team is using Matrix on Workers, handling real encrypted communications. It is fast, it is cheap, and it is arguably one of the most secure ways to deploy a homeserver today. Which one is it? | ||||||||
| ▲ | corvad 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I don't believe "Our team is using Matrix on Workers." The repo is in someone's personal Github and a pretty incomplete and insecure implementation. | ||||||||
| ▲ | philipwhiuk 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I guess they're dogfooding something that's wildly insecure and incomplete internally. Kind of surprising that's allowed on CloudFlare's internal network if true, but I guess shadow-IT is everywhere. | ||||||||
| ||||||||