| ▲ | geminigemino 3 hours ago | |
Yes, some parts are inherently O(n²) (mate finding, crowd density, predator/prey proximity, pathogen spread). Ecology needs pairwise relationships. To keep it sane, I don’t do naive all-vs-all. I use: Zone-based spatial indexing so most checks only run against local neighbors (roughly n/16 instead of n). Temporal caching of indices so they’re not rebuilt every tick. Statistical sampling for crowd density at high population (estimate from a fixed-size sample instead of full scans). So in practice it’s closer to O(n² / k), with k ≈ 16–50 depending on zone layout and population. You still see spikes during blooms, but it’s usually 10–30× faster than naive pairwise checks. | ||