I think he's really getting at something there. I've been thinking about this a lot (in the context of trying to understand the persistent-on-HN skepticism about LLMs), and the framing I came up with[1] is top-down vs. bottom-up dev styles, aka architecting code and then filling in implementations, vs. writing code and having architecture evolve.

[1] https://www.klio.org/theory-of-llm-dev-skepticism/

I like this framing. Nice typography btw, a pleasure to read.