Remix.run Logo
Psillisp 13 hours ago

Government intimidation of the practice of constitutional rights... what ever could go wrong.

spankalee 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I was replying specifically to this:

> This seems like a good example of that being enough metadata to be a big problem

I was not saying it's not a problem that the feds are doing this, because that's not what I was replying to.

Psillisp 13 hours ago | parent [-]

You are going to need to clarify more. I have no idea what you are for.

rationalist 13 hours ago | parent [-]

Why does a person have to be "for" something?

Psillisp 13 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

Volundr 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The statement was made to point out that this is an example where a phone number is enough metadata to to problematic for privacy. It stands on its own. It doesn't need more context or purpose.

rationalist 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"sleaze"?

refurb 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That seems like a weak argument.

I mean, carrying a weapon is a 2nd amendment right, but if I bring it to a protest and then start intimidating people with it, the police going after me is not "Government intimidation of the practice of constitutional rights".

Protesting is a constitution right, but if you break the law while protesting, you're fair game for prosecution.