> I’m not saying this ICE censorship is good

I hope not because it’s bad and that’s really all that matters in this conversation. And nitpicking whether or not there are other avenues for information is completely besides the point. I don’t even really understand what point you’re trying to make. If you think this is bad, then say it’s bad and we shouldn’t be ok with it. Saying “I’m not saying it’s good” then muddying the waters reads like you’re trying to defend the action.

▲

Aurornis 7 hours ago | parent [-]

> And nitpicking whether or not there are other avenues for information is completely besides the point

That was literally the argument I was responding to and talking about.

▲

Forgeties79 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I am not getting that from your previous comment but I’ll just assume I’m misreading it.

▲

Aurornis 7 hours ago | parent [-]

This entire comment thread was me responding to someone claiming that people “in other countries” have easy access to information.

Given the downvotes and angry responses I think a lot of people misinterpreted it as something else. I should learn to avoid comment sections about politics.

	▲	Forgeties79 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I don’t think that’s the lesson here if you’re looking for one. I think it’s just a clarity/phrasing issue. If that’s not what you meant then that’s fine, no harm no foul as far as I’m concerned. I was just going off how I read it. If you’re looking for feedback, “I’m not saying…” without saying what you are saying generally comes off as obfuscating or at best wishy washy.

▲

7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]