This article surprised me. I would have expected it would be about how _human_ code review is unsustainable in the face of AI-enhanced velocity.

I would be interested to hear of some specific use-cases for LLMs in code review.

With static analysis, tests, and formatters I thought code review was mostly interpersonal at this point. Mentorship, ensuring a chain of liability in approvals, negotiating comfort levels among peers with the shared responsibility of maintaining the code, that kind of thing.