Low code is not disappearing - it is simply changing.

What do you think an LLM is if not no/low-code?

And all the other components such as MCPs, skills, etc this is all low-code.

And who is going to plug all of these into a coherent system like Claude Code, Copilot, etc which is basically a low code interface. Sure it does not come with workflow-style designer but it does the same.

As far as the vibe-coded projects go, as someone who has personally made this mistake twice in my career and promised to never make it again, soon or later the OP will realise that software is a liability with and without LLMs. It is a security, privacy, maintenance and in general business burden and a risk that needs to be highlighted on every audit, and at every step.

When you start running the bills, all of these internal vibe-coded tools will run 10-20x the cost the original subscriptions that will be paid indirectly.

▲

discreteevent 9 hours ago | parent [-]

> What do you think an LLM is if not no/low-code?

An LLM is not low code. It's something that generates the thing that does the thing.

Most of the time it generates 'high' code. That high code is something that looks like hieroglyphics to non developers.

If it generated low code then it's possible that non developers could have something that is comprehensible to them (at least down as far as the deterministic abstraction presented by the low code framework)

	▲	_pdp_ 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Low or no code tools abstract away the idea of code being used. You are working with high-level concepts like workflows or in the case of coding assistants PRDs, etc. These coding assistants produce code but if you don't read the code at all it might as well not exist and frankly users who use Lovable (like may 10yo to make a website) have a vague idea that there is code behind all of this but frankly it does not really matter. So these are technically low-code tools - not in a traditional sense like workflows but still low code tools.