> we may have AI that is more capable than everyone in only 1-2 years

There's no evidence this will be the case...

What would you consider such evidence to look like?

	▲	xcodevn 5 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		For one, these models should be able to understand the physical world via images, audio, and video. I do agree that current models are quite good at coding, but that's mainly because coding is entirely text-based and easily verifiable. It's not obvious that this capability will transfer to other domains that aren't text-based and aren't as easily verifiable.
	▲	tom_ 6 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Well for starters the calendar year would have to be 2027 CE at the very earliest.

mrdependable 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm starting to think people who build these models are more likely to suffer from AI psychosis.

	▲	ares623 10 hours ago \| parent [-]
		"The worst person you know is being told 'You are absolutely right!' by an LLM right now"

pineaux 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

dont forget who is writing it and what he needs to think about it and what he wants others to think about it...