| ▲ | dahauns 7 hours ago | |
>verifiable "never looked at the original source" ...erm. To adress the elephant in the room: Who exactly is supposed to be verifiable to never have looked at the original source? You or the LLM? | ||
| ▲ | pmarreck 7 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Both. Good question. Although it would be much harder to prove, of course, that I never saw the original code/implementation. | ||