Now I'm intrigued why a free-speech attorney (from his wiki) kinda spooks AI model

Try Mistral (works for the examples here at least). Probably has the normal protections about how to make harmful things, but I find quite bad if in a country you make it illegal to even mention some names or events.

Yes, each LLM might give the thing a certain tone (like "Tiananmen was a protest with some people injured"), but completely forbidding mentioning them seems to just ask for the Streisand effect

> Jonathan Turley

Agreed just tested it out on Chatgpt. Surprising.

Then I asked it on Qwen 3 Max (this model) and it answered.

I mean I have always said but ask Chinese model american questions and American model chinese questions

I agree tiannman square thing isn't good look for china but so is the jonathan turley for chatgpt.

I think sacrifices are made on both sides and the main thing is still how good they are in general purpose things like actual coding not jonathon turley/tiannmen square because most likely people aren't gonna ask or have some probably common sense to not ask tiannmen square as genuine question to chinese models and American censorship to american models I guess. Plus there's European models like Mistral too for such questions which is what I would recommend lol (or South Korea's model too maybe)

Let's see how good qwen is at "real coding"

This one seems to be related to an individual who was incorrectly smeared by chatgpt. (Edited.)

> The AI chatbot fabricated a sexual harassment scandal involving a law professor--and cited a fake Washington Post article as evidence.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/04/05/chatgpt...

That is way different. Let's review:

a) The Chinese Communist Party builds an LLM that refuses to talk about their previous crimes against humanity.

b) Some americans build an LLM. They make some mistakes - their LLM points out an innocent law professor as a criminal. It also invent a fictitious Washington Post article.

The law professor threatens legal action. The american creators of the LLM begin censoring the name of the professor in their service to make the threat go away.

Nice curveball though. Damn.

You do it, my IP is now flagged (tried incognito and clearing cookies) - they want to have my phone number to let me continue using it after that one prompt.

(Edited, sorry.)

Yes, of course LLMs are shaped by their creators. Qwen is made by Alibaba Group. They are essentially one with the CCP.

Last time I tried something like that with an offline Qwen model I received a non-answer, no matter how hard I prompted it.