| ▲ | ozten 7 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Generative AI is a major setback to OSS licensing. I've been on projects where we needed to do a "cleanroom" implementation and vet the team has never viewed the source code of competing products. Now in the gen AI era, coding agents are IP laundering machines. They are trained on OSS code, but the nuances of the original licenses are lost. On the whole, I think it is a net gain for civilization, but if we zoom into OSS licensing... not good. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kode-targz 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
It could be a net gain for civilization if it stayed open, decentralized and off the hands of private companies, but that's not at all the case. Only tecchies care or even know about open models | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tracker1 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Probably fair... would also be interesting to try to limit the use of say GPL code to maintaining interoperability, not duplication of internal methods, etc. I also think that the amount of MIT/ISC/BSD, etc. licensed code, with whatever MS and other commercial entities have contributed for this use is probably enough to not be a significant difference to model quality though. | |||||||||||||||||||||||