| ▲ | metalman 20 hours ago |
| If graffiti changed anything it would be illegal. It's ok |
|
| ▲ | direwolf20 18 hours ago | parent [-] |
| It is illegal. It gives the population the idea they have the right to alter their environment, and that's dangerous. |
| |
| ▲ | readthenotes1 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | Alter other people's property. Agreed, that is a dangerous concept | | |
| ▲ | direwolf20 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | *in ways that don't harm that person | | |
| ▲ | browsingonly 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Not all harm is physical. | |
| ▲ | bigstrat2003 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Nonsense. The owner almost certainly doesn't want someone's "art" to adorn his wall, and will then have to pay to restore the wall to its desired condition. That is material harm done to the building owner. |
|
|
|