| ▲ | smnplk 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guix looks really tempting to me because i find guile scheme so much more pleasant than nix. But i heard there are not that many packages in Guix. I wonder if some sort of transpiler from nix derivations to guix package definitions would be possible. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | herewulf an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
You can run Nix packages on Guix if there isn't a "native" package for it. Look at nix-service. https://guix.gnu.org/manual/1.5.0/en/html_node/Miscellaneous... I've never felt the need myself. If something is missing, I add it and I think that is the real fun in running Guix because creating your own well defined package or service is deeply rewarding. Anyway, you can find people using it in the wild either by search engine[1] or with Toys[2] which is also handy for finding examples of missing packages too. [1]: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=fpas&q=%22config.scm%22+nix-servic... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | heavyset_go 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is where I'm at after using Nix for a few years for different use cases. I never want to write it again, and would welcome a Scheme over Nix. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | whompyjaw 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Im with you. As an emacsen, i feel it’s natural for me to use Guix, but nix is so so much more popular… :/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||