| ▲ | atonse 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clawdbot is interesting but I finally feel like those people who look at people like me raving about Claude code when it barely works for them. I have no doubt clawdBot, when it works, must feel great. But I’ve had the tough time setting it up and found it to be very buggy. My first couple of conversations? It forgot the context literally seconds later when I responded. Nevertheless, I’m sure it’s improving by the day so I’m going to set it up on my existing Mac mini because I think it has the capacity to be really fascinating. I built something similar (well… with a lot of integrations) but for running my company and continue to iterate on it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | HorizonXP 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I’ve been doing Vim + aider, and now Claude Code. Those tools I understood. I never got into Cursor because I’m too old to give up Vim. Clawd.bot really annoyed me at first. The setup is super tedious and broken and not fun. That’s mostly because I’m too impatient to tinker like I used to. However, once you tinker, it’s so-so. I don’t think it’s a lot better than Claude Code or anything, but I think it’s just a focused vector for the same AI model, one focused on being your personal assistant. It’s like Claude Code vs. Claude Cowork. They’re the same thing. But given the low cost of creating custom tools, why not give people something that Clawd.bot that gives them focused guardrails? Anyway, I could end up abandoning all of this too. And it’s all a kludge around things that should really be an API. But I do like that I can run it on my Mac Mini and have it control my desktop. It’ll be a cold day if I let it message for me; I’d rather it write deterministic code that does that, rather than do it directly. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cherioo 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What model did you use? At work tasks that Sonnet 4 and 4.5 failed miserably, Opus 4.5 can basically one shot them. I imagine it will be the same here. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||