My experience using ATProto is that it is somewhat like how the nascent blockchain apps were when they first came out: there's no written content that is viable. Instead, you're supposed to use ephemeral conversations and read a widely disparate set of notes in order to use it. In the end, the upshot of all this is that you get to use a slightly worse form of Twitter - which is already rather unpleasant to use for me because there's a lot of rage content there.

Microblogs are fun, and very often I can't justify a whole blog post, but I have seen that others just post their thoughts intermingled and it makes me wonder if perhaps that is what I should do. There's not that much utility to the wide audience anyway. Talking to people who understand you is much nicer anyway.

ATProto can be used be used for a lot more than just microblogs

https://tangled.org/

Blockchain is still like that. Today I am setting up a blockchain node. The chain is actually two chains that recursively depend on each other. The docs say to start one of them first and wait for it to fully sync. It prints a timeout error for every block, saying the other chain node software was unreachable, and is estimated to catch up to current block height in about 200 years, which can't be right. Maybe I need to run both nodes at once contrary to the explicit instructions in the docs which say not to do so.

I wouldn't be surprised if half of all blockchains were vulnerable to some kind of trivial double–spend attack because it's not possible that all the complexity has eyes on it.

Edit: you're supposed to download a 2GB JSON file containing the state as of the last migration.

The normal way to set up most blockchain nodes these days is to rsync someone else's node's working directory. Obviously this is worthless as far as a decentralised and trustless system goes.

>you get to use a slightly worse form of Twitter

The protocol can support all sorts of other social networks. People are building things akin to instagram, tiktok, medium, allrecipies, etc