| ▲ | sgjohnson 3 hours ago | |||||||
Blocking port 25 is perfectly reasonable. There are no sane and legitimate reasons for running an SMTP server on a residential connection. Even most server providers will block it unless you give them some very good reasons. Blocking 53 is just weird though. | ||||||||
| ▲ | myself248 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Define "residential connection". There is no such thing. A connection to the internet should be equal to any other connection to the internet, modulo BGP peering. Noone has a right to dictate what services I run or don't run, what protocols I speak or don't speak, what traffic I accept or deny, but *me*. That's the whole point of being on the internet rather than Prodigy or Compuserve or something. The physical location of that connection is irrelevant. Maybe I feel my servers are safer in a datacenter. Maybe I feel they're safer in my basement. In my case, it is very much the latter, and again, you don't get to make that call. I do. | ||||||||
| ▲ | daneel_w 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I'm not sure you read the OP's comment in full. They are talking about inbound traffic from the Internet. It's certainly a lot more common a case to self-host an MX than running an open DNS resolver or authorative name server. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | tsss an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Whether or not I have a sane reason to use port 25 is none of their business. | ||||||||