| ▲ | armchairhacker an hour ago | |
I think reasonable immigration debate would benefit the left, or at least the anti-right. Many people want deportations but don’t like how Trump is doing them. And he doesn’t seem to be going after employers, which would be more effective. In fact, I think the lack of debate is really hurting today's left. | ||
| ▲ | datsci_est_2015 an hour ago | parent [-] | |
> In fact, I think the lack of debate is really hurting today's left. Moderate left voices are not featured in the current media landscape. The Democrat party is, at best, centrist, if not currently undergoing a conservative transformation parallel to the Republican party’s reactionary transformation. And for that reason: > And he doesn’t seem to be going after employers, which would be more effective. this is a complete nonstarter. In any case, there are plenty of calls for reform from the left. “Abolish ICE” (like “Defund the police”) is not equivalent to “end immigration enforcement” (or likewise “end law enforcement”), even though the histrionics across the media landscape would have you believe that. It’s a core leftwing tenet (imho) that organizations that are rotten must be eliminated, and if appropriate, their leadership and members punished. New organizations can then step in to fulfill the role of the previous organization, sans rot. In that sense, “Many people want deportations but don’t like how Trump is doing them.” see more eye-to-eye with the “Abolish ICE” people than the media wants them to believe. | ||