| ▲ | Joker_vD 3 hours ago | |
Do I understand it correctly that the logic is that if timestamp B is above timestamp A, but the difference is more than half of the unsigned range, B is considered to happen before A? | ||
| ▲ | rcxdude 21 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
Yes. When the timestamps wrap it's fundamentally ambiguous, but this will be correct unless the timestamps are very far apart (and the failure mode is more benign: a really long time difference being considered shorter is better than all time differences being considered zero after the timestamp wraps). | ||