Remix.run Logo
tonymet 6 hours ago

tragically, because of efficiency standards, modern engines are known to burn oil .

Otherwise you may be smelling cars who have had the cats stolen.

seanmcdirmid 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

A lot of old cars also since new cars are so expensive.

SoftTalker 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yep. My newest car is over 20 years old. May be a bit more polluting (though it doesn't smell or smoke) but I've in theory saved the environmental impact of the manufacture of one or two new cars by keeping the old one.

I'm not spending $30-40k or more on a car. That just isn't going to happen.

MBCook 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think expense is basically the problem.

Cost to replace the catalytic converter, cost for new exhaust pipes, cost to diagnose ignition timing problems. Whatever.

If the car drives and you don’t have the money I can completely understand why someone wouldn’t get the problem fixed. Even if it means they’re burning a 1/3 of their fuel, that’s still less in the short term than the $1500 it may cost to fix it.

It’s insanely rare I get the sense that the person is running really dirty on purpose.

I don’t know what a realistic fairway to fix it is. They’re probably isn’t one. I don’t think fines would work, it would probably just make things worse. Seems like the kind of thing where a little government group to find the worst 0.1% of cars on the road and just get them back to reasonable levels would be a huge help.

But that’s not how we do things.

rblatz 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Some states handle this by requiring cars over a certain age to be emission checked before you can renew its registration. Failing cars have to be fixed and rechecked before you can get your tags.

seanmcdirmid 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I think they stop checking cars after a certain year. Like, if you are driving a 1980 Buick, they won’t make you scrap it because it’s emission tech is way out of date.

MBCook 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Stolen cars, exhaust leaks before the cat, incomplete combustion so bad the cat can’t cover it up. I assume it’s stuff like that.

It’s not whatever tiny bit of oil gets burned in a healthy engine.

SoftTalker 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Incomplete combustion will ruin a cat. That's not its purpose, it's there to reduce NOx emissions.

Der_Einzige 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

A lot of Americans take their cat off on purpose for louder noises.

Additionally, a lot of conservatives love to "Roll coal", and literally will shit up the environment on purpose just because they feel schadenfreude from pissing of an environmentalist.

Aurornis 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> A lot of Americans take their cat off on purpose for louder noises.

Some people remove catalytic converters when they install a performance exhaust. Nobody is doing it for louder noises because the muffler portion is what dampens the sound.

Also I wouldn’t say it’s “a lot of Americans”. We have emissions inspections in most major cities and your car won’t pass if you remove the catalytic converter. They can now detect modified ECUs, too. Someone would have to be so determined to do this that they’d swap the exhaust in and out every time they had to do emissions inspections.

driverdan 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Nobody is doing it for louder noises because the muffler portion is what dampens the sound.

Cats also act as mufflers, they significantly reduce the sound coming out the exhaust.

Der_Einzige an hour ago | parent [-]

I had downvotes on this post until you (and the other car enthusiasts) pointed this out / saw this.

HNs lack of knowledge around cars is sort of frightening.

Der_Einzige 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I know a LOT of people personally who swap their exhaust in and out just for emissions inspections. That's the meta.

pvab3 5 hours ago | parent [-]

a lot of people have custom exhausts, particularly catback systems that don't affect emissions. A lot of people are definitely not rolling coal.

wholinator2 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yeah, it's definitely a small percent of people. But i do wonder how many there really has to be to have an outsized effect. One of those lifted kid killers blowing black smoke for the entire duration of the bicycle pack is definitely more than 3 of my tiny honda civics, i wonder how many it really is, and how much those modifications increase the "resting emissions rate"even when not blowing shit. Should be illegal, likely is.

drzaiusx11 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I'd wager it's largely disruptive and dangerous in a highly localized way due to the small percentage of folks doing it. Doesn't make it an acceptable practice though. One person "rolling coal" can temporarily blind 3 or 4 cars back and several across depending on wind conditions, etc.

drzaiusx11 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I live in a progressive state and unfortunately encounter "coal rolling" regularly. I also assume that's the point. Someone has to "own all the libs" as it were

However, I do agree that there aren't enough folks "rolling coal" in aggregate to really move any needles on planet-scale environmental impacts though. Just VERY unpleasant to be caught behind.

MBCook 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I’ve run into a few of those. They’re generally pretty obvious. Usually a big truck, lots of MAGA & adjacent bumper stickers.

I haven’t noticed people removing the catalytic converters just for noise. The rare time I see a car that wants to be loud it usually just seems to be the exhaust end they changed, or maybe removed the muffler.

The kind of stuff I’m complaining about mostly seems to be older cars, or those in poor mechanical shape. Cases where the people probably just don’t have the money to fix it.

5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]