| ▲ | PEe9bB7D 9 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matrix is getting traction though... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Nextgrid 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matrix is a lost cause. The protocol is too complex/ambitious and the company behind it doesn't have the resources to actually produce a good server nor client implementation. I was hopeful for it at first but at some point you have to be realistic. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kelnos 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is it? My experience with it has been middling at best, and I communicate with exactly zero people through Matrix outside of the context of open source projects. The UX is still pretty bad, with many rough edges around sign-in and device verification. The message/encryption story has gotten better (it's been a long time since I've gotten spurious errors about being unable to decrypt messages), but it's still not particularly easy to use. Performance-wise I've found it to still be fairly bad; loading messages after I've been offline takes a noticeable amount of pause, something I rarely see with other messaging platforms. On the plus side, Matrix does have many chat features that many people like (or even require) in a chat platform, like formatting, emojis, message reactions, threads, etc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||