| ▲ | altern8 9 hours ago |
| This is pretty amazing, but I wish they picked a better name for it. I have a feeling that a good amount of people will dismiss it just because of the name. |
|
| ▲ | kelnos 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| What's wrong with the name? "WhatsApp" sounds pretty dumb to me, too, but it's entrenched in the social consciousness, so we don't really think about it. (The name even has nothing to do with chat; originally WhatsApp was a way to share your "current status"; "WhatsApp" sounds like "what's up?".) |
| |
| ▲ | LexiMax 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Complaining about names seems like a surefire way to induce endless bikeshedding conversations that go nowhere. It's also often cited as a too-convenient excuse for why a service fails that doesn't really account for the market realities or whatever systemic failures were at play. The truth is that 15 years ago, "tweet" was seen as a joke by those who weren't extremely online. It didn't stop Twitter from becoming a desirable place to socialize, at least for a time. If the internet made "tweet" happen, people can get used to any weird nomenclature. | | |
| ▲ | trinix912 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | The problem I have with names like BirdyChat is they're not easy to remember and even less easy to explain to someone whose first language isn't English. Like yeah, we know it's "Chat" and "Bird" combined and all but to a lot of people it's just "Bdytsch something". Compare that to Twitter which is relatively easy to pronounce and remember. Forgejo is even worse in that regard. I live in Europe, speak 5 languages, and still have to think to remember the proper pronunciation every time. It's much harder to get people on board with yet another messenger app when they forget the name 5 minutes later. |
| |
| ▲ | GoatInGrey 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Birdy evokes the same energy as "BabySeal". I imagine you can understand why an app called "BabySealChat" would be off-putting to a thirty-something disgruntled developer? | |
| ▲ | altern8 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't think Whatsapp sounds dumb. It's "what's up", and it came out when mobile apps were getting popular with everyone. I immediately got it when I heard it the first time, and it sounded good to me. "BirdyChat" just sounds childish. Maybe I'm in the minority, who knows, but project names are important. I've seen so many posts of people dismissing projects just because of the name... | | |
| ▲ | pbhjpbhj 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Gimp would have to be the extreme example of this. I used to recommend Krita to people, despite it being less appropriate for photo editing, just to avoid using 'Gimp' in work/polite scenarios. I agree - "Birdy" is the name used with infants when talking about birds, or is a bird toy that photographers use to distract people ... which is a bit too close to the truth, perhaps. To me it also suggests 'a toy version of Twitter'; and Twitter already had enough negativity around it for me. | | |
| ▲ | LexiMax 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Somehow I feel like GIMP's lack of popularity has more to do with its reputation for having a horrendous and impenetrable interface than its name. At one point in the recent past there was a fork of GIMP named "Glimpse," yet weren't a sudden influx of users who were waiting for a more polite name. | | |
| ▲ | altern8 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | I would say both. BUT, lack of users might just be that it's too late, now. People use web-based tools like Figma, I wouldn't think a lot of people are looking for a Photoshop alternative. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | snowmobile 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What's wrong with the name? Some cultural reference I'm not getting? |
| |
| ▲ | altern8 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It just sounds—let's say—too playful. Specially if you go to the homepage and they're trying to market it as a work too.. If I went to my boss and tried to make the case that we should move all of our encrypted communication from Whatsapp to something called BirdyChat they would laugh at me and dismiss the idea. That might just be me, not sure. | | | |
| ▲ | wiether 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Personally I hate the name because it reminds me of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birdy_Nam_Nam (whose work I like) | |
| ▲ | drcongo 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I couldn't work out what the hell the app is from the website, as the home page tells you it's a "New Home for Work Chat" and mentions "Still using personal chat apps for work conversations?" - so I'm guessing it's supposed to have some business focus, but the app name makes it sound like something you'd install for your kids. I can't imagine ever saying to someone "we need to discuss contract details, let's talk on BirdyChat". | | |
| ▲ | altern8 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes, exactly. It looks like it's focused on business but its name sounds childish. If I mentioned that in a corporate meeting people would just laugh at me, I don't think it helps their case. |
| |
| ▲ | Onavo 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Twitter. Also it could mean penis (in some places). |
|
|
| ▲ | TZubiri 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It can always be rebranded later on |
