Windows 95 was Microsoft's biggest commercial hit at that point. Selling 40m copies in its first year.

There's no doubt that it went in to upgrade plenty of 386s/486s until the owners upgraded their hardware.

You needed at least 12 MB RAM to run Windows 95 smoothly. There were plenty of 8 MB systems that really really struggled. Even booting up was a swap fest.

I remember immediately upgrading to 12 MB. 8 MB was painful.

Not all 386 class systems could be upgraded to 12 MB or more.

▲

EvanAnderson 7 hours ago | parent [-]

I did a ton of upgrades from 3.1 to Windows 95 in late 1996 and early 1997 on 386 and 486 machines with 4MB of RAM. I still have a "mark" from the tedium. Some of the machines didn't have a large enough hard drive to store a copy of the setup files (the "CAB files") so until the company issued me a ZIP drive I had to do "the floppy shuffle" with 20-ish disks.

It ran like crap with 4MB of RAM but it did run. Opening anything much resulted in paging.

	▲	vardump 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Your mileage may vary. I remember 4 MB booting, but being absolutely useless. 8 MB was still swapping all the time, you couldn't really run much beyond some simple software. 12 MB was finally enough to do something productive, but definitely nothing luxurious.