You can always count on someone coming along and defending the multi-trillion dollar corporation that just so happens to take a screenshot of your screen every few seconds (among many, many - too many other things)

▲

Aurornis 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Sorry to interrupt the daily rage session with some neutral facts about how Windows and the law work.

> that just so happens to take a screenshot of your screen every few seconds

Recall is off by default. You have to go turn it on if you want it.

	▲	dns_snek 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It only became off by default after those "daily rage sessions" created sufficient public pressure to turn them off. Microsoft also happens to own LinkedIn which conveniently "forgets" all of my privacy settings every time I decide to review them (about once a year) and discover that they had been toggled back to the privacy-invasive value without my knowledge. This has happened several times over the years.

▲

yoyohello13 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I big demographic of HN users are people who want to be the multi-trillion dollar corporation so it’s not too surprising. In this case though I think they are right. And I’m a big time Microsoft hater.

	▲	dijit 10 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		The defenders of Microsoft are right? How? There is no point locking your laptop with a passphrase if that passphrase is thrown around. Sure, maybe some thief can't get access, but they probably can if they can convince Microsoft to hand over the key. Microsoft should not have the key, thats part of the whole point of FDE; nobody can access your drive except you. The cost of this is that if you lose your key: you also lose the data. We have trained users about this for a decade, there have been countless dialogues explaining this, even if we were dumber than we were (we're not, despite what we're being told: users just have fatigue from over stimulation due to shitty UX everywhere); then it's still a bad default.

▲

zer00eyz 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A ... Then, years later every one acts like Snowden had some big reveal.

There is the old password for candy bar study: https://blog.tmb.co.uk/passwords-for-chocolate

Do users care? I would posit that the bulk of them do not, because they just dont see how it applies to them, till they run into some type of problem.

▲

patja 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Are you referring to Microsoft Recall? My understanding is that is opt-in and only stored locally.

▲

parliament32 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Stored locally.. until it's uploaded by OneDrive or Windows Backup?

	▲	2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]

▲

mcmcmc 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

AI enshittification is irrelevant here. Why is someone pointing out that sensible secure defaults are a good thing suddenly defending the entire company?

▲

ChromaticPanic 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Uploading your encryption keys up to someone else's machine is not a sensible default

	▲	crazygringo 36 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It generally is, because in the vast majority of cases users will not keep a local copy and will lose their data. Most (though not all) users are looking for encryption to protect their data from a thief who steals their laptop and who could extract their passwords, banking info, etc. Not from the government using a warrant in a criminal investigation. If you're one of the subset of people worried about the government, you're generally not using default options.

▲

ryandrake 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

	▲	walletdrainer 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		This is ridiculous. There are a lot of people here criticising MSFT for implementing a perfectly reasonable encryption scheme. This isn’t some secret backdoor, but a huge security improvement for end-users. This mechanism is what allows FDE to be on by default, just like (unencrypted) iCloud backups do for Apple users. Calling bs on people trying to paint this as something it’s not is not “whiteknighting”.

▲

gruez 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes, because object level facts matter, and it's intellectually dishonest to ignore the facts and go straight into analyzing which side is the most righteous, like:

>Microsoft is an evil corporation, so we must take all bad stories about them at face value. You're not some corpo bootlicker, now, are you? Now, in unrelated news, I heard Pfizer, another evil corporation with a dodgy history[1] is insisting their vaccines are safe...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pfizer#Legal_issues

▲

LoganDark 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Microsoft doesn't take the screenshot; their operating system does if Recall is enabled, and although the screenshots themselves are stored in an insecure format and location, Microsoft doesn't get them by default.