| ▲ | cogman10 3 hours ago |
| > Microsoft told Forbes that the company sometimes provides BitLocker recovery keys to authorities, having received an average of 20 such requests per year. At least they are honest about it, but a good reason to switch over to linux. Particularly if you travel. If microsoft is giving these keys out to the US government, they are almost certainly giving them to all other governments that request them. |
|
| ▲ | Aurornis 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It's not like companies have a choice. If they have a key in their possession and law enforcement gets an order for it, they have to provide it. |
| |
| ▲ | function_seven 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That only strengthens the parent point. Switch to an OS where this requirement doesn't come into play if you're worried about any governments having a backdoor into your own machine. | | |
| ▲ | Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Switch to an OS where this requirement doesn't come into play I use BitLocker on my Windows box without uploading the keys. I don't even have it connected to a Microsoft account. This isn't a requirement. | | | |
| ▲ | charcircuit 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you sync your Linux machines key in the cloud, police could subpoena it too. The solution is not to switch to Linux, but to stop storing it in plain text in the cloud. | | |
| |
| ▲ | Zambyte 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > It's not like companies have a choice. > If they have a key in their possession [...] So they do have a choice. | | |
| ▲ | mc32 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | People/users have an option to keep the key themselves. Most wouldn’t bother to manage encryption keys. |
| |
| ▲ | egorfine 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | And even if they don't have the key. Case in point: https://medium.com/@tahirbalarabe2/the-encryption-dilemma-wh... |
|
|
| ▲ | TrainedMonkey 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| All other governments is a stretch here, but likelihood of at least one another government getting same privileges is extremely high. |
|
| ▲ | slashdave 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why take the drastic step of switching to linux (a difficult endeavor) when you can simply turn off key uploading. |
| |
| ▲ | varun_ch 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Why continue to use an operating system that’s adversarial towards you? | | |
| ▲ | bogwog 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I will never understand this from software engineers/tech people in general. That demographic knows how technology works, and are equipped to see exactly where and how Microsoft is taking advantage of them, and how the relationship is all take and zero give from their end. These people are also in the strongest position to switch to Linux. The only explanation that makes sense to me is that there's an element of irrationality to it. Apple has a well known cult, but Microsoft might have one that's more subtle? Or maybe it's a reverse thing where they hate Linux for some equally irrational reasons? That one is harder to understand because Linux is just a kernel, not a corporation with a specific identity or spokesperson (except maybe Torvalds, but afaik he's well-regarded by everyone) |
| |
| ▲ | wolvoleo 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Because that gives you a lot more control over your computer than just solving this particular issue. If you care about privacy it's definitely a good idea. | |
| ▲ | egorfine 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Because Microsoft absolutely will make it mandatory somewhere in the not so distant future. | |
| ▲ | knowitnone3 29 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | oh man, it's so difficult even teenagers can do it within an hour and all they have to do is click on a few buttons. |
|
|
| ▲ | illusive4 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [dead] |