| ▲ | fragmede 4 hours ago | |
We can tell you weren't around for the advent of compilers. To be fair, neither was I since the UNIX c compiler came out in '68 and was by far not the first compiler. Modern comilers you can make that claim about, but early compilers weren't. | ||
| ▲ | recursive 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
All compilers have bugs. Any loss of semantics during compilation would be considered a bug. In order to do that, the source and target language need to be structured and specified. I wasn't around in the 60s either, but I think that hasn't changed. | ||
| ▲ | georgemcbay 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
I've been programming since 6502/6510 assembly language and all compilers I've used were deterministic (which isn't the same thing as being bug free or producing the correct output for a given input). | ||
| ▲ | tjr 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Which early compilers were nondeterministic? | ||