Asking an LLM about SSH (hint: the two S-es stand for security) would tell you why only having packet capture in Wireshark isn't going to reveal shit.

▲

JohnLeitch 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not even remotely accurate. While the dissector is not as mature as I thought and there's no built-in decryption as there is for TLS, that doesn't matter much. Hint: every component of the system is attacker controlled in this scenario.

	▲	fragmede 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Not even remotely accurate. > there's no built-in decryption Is that because wireshark can't do that just from packet captures?

▲

sureglymop 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Wireshark can decrypt it, so I don't understand what you mean?

	▲	fragmede 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Not from packet captures, it can't.

▲

4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]