The author was frustrated that the error message identified him as an organisation (that was disabled) and mockingly refers to himself as the (disabled) organisation in the post.

At least, that’s my reading but it appears it confuses about half of the commenters here.

▲

ryandrake 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I think if one's readers need an "ironic euphemism decoder glossary" just to understand the message, it could use a little re-writing.

▲

layer8 6 hours ago | parent [-]

It was perfectly understandable to me. Maybe cultural differences? You seem to be American, OP Portuguese, and myself European as well.

	▲	superb_dev 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I’m American and it made sense
	▲	ashirviskas 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Another European chiming in, I enjoyed OPs article.