They whistleblowed themselves that Claude Cowork was coded by Claude Code… :)

throwup238 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You can tell they’re all vibe coded.

Claude iOS app, Claude on the web (including Claude Code on the web) and Claude Code are some of the buggiest tools I have ever had to use on a daily basis. I’m including monstrosities like Altium and Solidworks and Vivado in the mix - software that actually does real shit constrained by the laws of physics rather than slinging basic JSON and strings around over HTTP.

It’s an utter embarrassment to the field of software engineering that they can’t even beat a single nine of reliability in their consumer facing products and if it wasn’t for the advantage Opus has over other models, they’d be dead in the water.

▲

loopdoend 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Single nine reliability would be 90% uptime lol. For 99.9% we call it triple 9 reliability.

	▲	throwup238 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Single 9 would be 90%, which is roughly what I’m experiencing between CC for Web and the Claude iOS app. About 1 in 10 messages fail because of an unknown error and 1 in 10 CC for web sessions die irrecoverably. It’d probably be worse except for the fact that CC’s bugs in the terminal aren’t show stoppers like they are on web/mobile. The only way Anthropic has two or three nines is in read only mode, but that’s be like measuring AWS using the console uptime while ignoring the actual control plane.

▲

fizx an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

hey, they have 9 8's

▲

cactusplant7374 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You're right.

https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues

Codex has less but they also had quite a few outages in December. And I don't think Codex is as popular as Claude Code but that could change.

▲

notsure2 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Whistleblowed dog food.

	▲	b00ty4breakfast 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		normally you don't share your dog food when you find out it actually sucks.