FWIW, NVIDIA enterprise hardware does come with good warranty and prompt RMA service.

A deep dive on why these beastly cards fail so frequently compared to all other common current day hardware would be fascinating!

▲

nickysielicki 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

> A deep dive on why these beastly cards fail so frequently compared to all other common current day hardware would be fascinating!

P=CV²f

▲

indoordin0saur 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I don't know much about the subject but GPUs were originally meant for gaming and would run for a few hours to several hours a day and then would get rest periods. The amount of power draw on them would also vary throughout the time they were being actively used. With constant 24/7 usage at max capacity is it just possible that they are being pushed beyond what they were originally engineered for?

▲

ls65536 5 hours ago | parent [-]

My intuition would be that constant usage (not exceeding maximum rated capacity/thermals/etc.) should generally result in less wear compared to the more frequent thermal cycling that you might expect from intermittent use, but maybe there's something else going on here too. I suppose this would depend on what exactly the cause of the failure is.

Either way, these are obviously being intentionally sold to be used for non-gaming-type workloads, so it wouldn't be a good argument to state that they're just being (ab)used beyond what they were inteded for...unless somehow they really are being pushed beyond design limits, but given the cost of these things I can't imagine anyone doing this willingly with a whole fleet of them.

▲

greenavocado 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Electromigration may be a factor

	▲	zozbot234 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Electromigration decays exponentially with inverse temperature. If it's genuinely a factor, you're running that GPU way too hot.